User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rusalkii | 57 | 0 | 1 | 100 | Open | 19:36, 23 April 2025 | 6 days, 10 hours | no | report |
| EggRoll97 | 85 | 32 | 8 | 73 | Open | 15:07, 19 April 2025 | 2 days, 6 hours | no | report |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 36.78.195.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Maoputh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Rajinderallsikh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- 14.192.214.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- 183.91.2.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 129.126.36.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. Toast1454TC 01:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- 120.29.66.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 112.206.58.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Gud Morning Kapatid and Frontline Pilipinas, vandalism after final warning. Persistent disruptive editing, zero communications. 36.78.195.224 (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:4040:2C7E:A100:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing across multiple articles. Range was also blocked a little under a month ago for block evasion?... Not sure what IP and/or user that it's block evasion of, so no clue if this is still the case or not. Magitroopa (talk) 03:42, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Red rice sweet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – LTA Rgalo10. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 04:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- AngelNumberG (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) All edits are link spam. 91.129.111.106 (talk) 04:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- BillJea23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Only one edit, but obvious sock of AngelNumberG (compare Special:Diff/1256723895 and Special:Diff/1278562780). 91.129.111.106 (talk) 04:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2800:98:1063:DCA5:89F3:BD21:547D:53D0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) I believe this is an IP proxy of 2803:D100:F280:18C4:0:0:0:0/64. Former IP made the exact same edits as the latter IP range, who's 6-month block is set to expire in a few days. No sign of ever stopping this pattern of disruptive editing and vandalism dating back months. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 04:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Armandoselso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Unsourced additions after multiple warnings and notices. — Benison (Beni · talk) 05:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Tanveer gilgit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Card game: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Belbury (talk) 07:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- 45.132.155.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism
- 180.147.91.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) massive vandalism/spam — The Seal F1 (talk) 08:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Simply impossible to communicate with an IP hopper to get them to the talk page. Moxy🍁 22:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring. Snokalok (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Snokalok is being disruptive by not providing any reasoning for their edits. How am I supposed to know why my edits are wrong? Please temporarily block Snokalok until they have read the guideline regarding edit summaries.2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Protection seems like a good idea given the situation in the UK. The IP above is edit warring and pretending not to know why their edits are wrong. They are very lucky to have avoided a warning template. Snokalok is evidently much nicer than I am when dealing with trolls. DanielRigal (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- How is the edit wrong? Not a single reason was ever provided to me 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- changing "a" definition to "the standard" definition, even though other dictionary definitions for "woman" exist ApexParagon (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- But only one can be the standard definition 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:FDD0:7625:4BA3:2D8A (talk) 03:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Fwiw, one ruling in one country doesn't automatically change the standard definition. Lectonar (talk) 06:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- changing "a" definition to "the standard" definition, even though other dictionary definitions for "woman" exist ApexParagon (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- How is the edit wrong? Not a single reason was ever provided to me 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ApexParagon (talk) 02:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs addition of content against consensus and edit warring. Vestrian24Bio 02:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – WP:BLP violations of a WP:AP2, requires arbitration enforcement. I am WP:INVOLVED. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Some specific IP user tries to turn this redirect into an article. Too soon until Supercard of Honor (2025). Needs protection until 3 May (the end of ppv/event). Mann Mann (talk) 03:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA Rgalo10. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 03:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 04:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page keeps getting vandalised by IPs. Nobody (talk) 05:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: 90% of edits to this page are reverted, all of them are by unregistered editors. Stumbling9655 (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Literally months go by without any edit at all. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stickymatch 06:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. 75.99.71.90 (talk) 06:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 07:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long-term edit warring on concert's figures between 2 extended-confirmed editors. Both has been notified on exceeding 3RR. A discussion was opened in the talk page on February 2025 but there isn't consensus as of today. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Then we need some more eyes on it; WP:3O might be another venue to try. Lectonar (talk) 07:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by blocked user Colonialmid. Ekdalian (talk) 08:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Excessively being edited and vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined I just see normal editing activity, nothing excessive stands out. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: important page you need to be protected 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism edits and unsourced content additions have returned since protection expired last week. Large number of past protections, could be a case for longer term semi. Entranced98 (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits on a controversial topic, as soon as the article protection expires. Requires autoconfirmed protection. Preferably indefinitely. Barseghian Lilia (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Battle For Dream Island has the requisite number of prominent secondary sources (3) which have written on the subject. This is enough cause for the creation of a Wikipedia article, as explicitly stated under Wikipedia's criteria for article notability and creation. Gisrhgver (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- You dead sure about that? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I had created around 50+ articles on the English wikipedia, I handle and edit topics mostly on colonial architectures, there are many articles needed to be created on that feild so I would like to request Autopatrolled rights for my account and also to help page reviewers for decreasing workload. Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I’ll mostly use AWB for small fixes like typos and other minor errors ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I’ve made over 250+ non automated edits and would like to request AWB for repetitive cleanup, fixing links and also to maintain article quality. 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights @1# Wakabenga 17:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
I already have autoconfirmed status (view here) But if I click verify on a template on my user page that says I have the permission, it has no log. I was wondering if you could somehow grant me this access again so that there may be a log that I have this permission. MersmanD (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my EC revoked because of gaming of the system. I believe this happened March 22, 2025. Since then, I have attempted to edit constructively on Wikipedia. I want to see if there is a way that I can get EC. Thanks again |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to expand my contributions to Wikipedia by helping address the extensive backlog at NPP. I have been an active participant in the AfC process as a probationary reviewer for multiple months, and I regularly take part in AfDs and occasionally in PRODs within the scope of WP:PHILIPPINES. While I understand that my impact on the backlog may not be significant in terms of numbers, I am committed to performing thorough, policy-aligned reviews to the best of my ability. AstrooKai (Talk) 19:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I had a trial permission to manage redirects close to a year ago, if I remember correctly. I did not have time for the back half of that trial, but have more time now. I have noticed how large the article backlog is and would try to work on lowering that, since I am finding myself with a lot more free time on here. Generally think I have a good past experience with AfD, not as much as some, but understand most guidelines well. May leave some more questionable pages up for a different reviewer, but have a good record adding categories and WikiProjects on my own article. Lots of my current pages are election pages or football pages, so might lean more into reviewing those since I am most familiar with those guidelines. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was granted temporary New page reviewer rights on 14 January 2025 ([12]) for a period of two months and again on 20 March ([13]) for an additional month. This current period is due to expire on 20 April. I would appreciate it if these rights could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 05:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active mostly at the creator side for a while and would like to help out in the filtering/supporting new editors and pages. Juxlos (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
I was granted temporary New Page Reviewer rights for one month, which expire on 20 April. During this period, I carefully completed a reasonable number of reviews (of pages of various topics), including reviewing and tagging new pages with banners, draftifying, requesting speedy deletions, and creating AfDs. While reviewing new pages, I often searched for additional reliable sources and added them to the articles I was reviewing, to ensure that they were not lacking significant coverage references. It was time-consuming, but I felt it was a good thing to do. Therefore, I kindly ask to review my NPP work and, if it's ok, consider granting me permanent NPP rights. Cinder painter (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
I believe I meet most criteria. Plus I already review scientific articles irl, so I would say I have some experience on reviewing in general. Here to help where needed. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was given the New Page Reviewer rights as a one-month trial. This permission will expire on 20 April 2025. During this time, I have been doing active reviewing of new pages and learning more about notability, reliable sources, and the CSD/PROD/AfD process. I tried always to be careful and make constructive reviews. I really want to keep helping with this work. So I would like to ask if possible to renew or give the reviewer rights permanently, depending on my work this last month. Thanks a lot for your time and consideration. Ambrosiawater (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request permission to become a Pending Changes Reviewer. I have read most of Wikipedia’s core policies. I have also read and understood the guidelines outlined for the Reviewing pending changes. I believe PCR will help me accepting or rejecting edits. I also warn new editors when necessary. Imwin567 (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
The main think I have done on Wikipedia has been undoing unconstructive edits. I am also asking this so I can more easily review recent changes. I will not be rude to newcomers. MersmanD (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I have been editing constructively on the project for a few years now and would like to more effectively revert disruptive edits when I encounter them. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and understand the distinction between purely disruptive edits and edits that may be unhelpful but are made in good-faith. When reverting a new user's edits, I make sure to properly explain myself in an edit summary and leave a message on the relevant article's or user's talk page as appropriate, unless the user is obviously acting in bad faith and WP:DENY applies, in which case I report them to a relevant noticeboard. I have thoroughly read the WP:ROLLBACK instructions and will make sure to familiarize myself with the tools before using them, and avoid using the rollback tools when they are not appropriate and another reversion tool would be more suitable. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
I request rollback rights to quickly revert clear vandalism and disruptive edits. This would help maintain article integrity and ease the workload for admins, especially during active vandalism periods. Thank you for considering my request. VeritasVanguard: "Seeking truth in every edit" 16:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
The main thing I do on Wikipedia is revert vandalism. Before, I had to click on the article > view history > undo > put warning on talk page using twinkle. If I had the rollback permission, I would only have to click rollback > put warning on talk page using twinkle. If I had the rollback permission, I would be able to much more easily revert vandalism. Thanks for your consideration. MersmanD (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|